WARLOCK ENGINEERING / INTERACTIVE RESEARCH WORKSPACE

Darrieus Engineering Notebook

Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine & Generator Research

YOU ARE VIEWINGStep 01 · Rotor aerodynamics

Swipe across the steps to see the complete notebook roadmap →

ENGINEERING NOTEBOOK / STEP 01 / RESEARCH ROTORS

Rotor aerodynamics.

Compare published rotor configurations, preserve the source evidence and explore their Cp–TSR curves.

YOUR ROTOR · SELECTED STUDY

See the rotor you are matching.

Watanabe et al. (2016) · NACA0024 straight blades. Choose the paper's blade count, chord and wind-lens configuration. The dimensions below are the tested reference.

0.70 mdiameter0.35 mradius0.70 mtested blade length
See the complete engineering roadmap ↓

The model evaluates the source-supported TSR interval only. No generator load is calculated on this page.

Explore the rotor model ↓
SECTION A / ROTOR CONFIGURATION

See the rotor configuration.

Rotor elevation, blade layout and theoretical airfoil section follow the selected research study and chord.

ROTOR CONFIGURATION / SCHEMATIC

Selected rotor schematic.

Rotor & blade sectionSCHEMATIC · SOURCE DIMENSIONS
ELEVATION · STRAIGHT BLADES
PLAN · BLADE LAYOUT
NACA 0024 · c = 100 mm
c = 100 mm

H = 0.70 m · D = 0.700 m · 3 straight blades

Published rotor dimensions; schematic supports and theoretical NACA section, not measured profiles or fabrication CAD.

SECTION B / ADJUST AND COMPARE

Adjust and compare.

Choose a published rotor, adjust the supported settings and watch the Cp–TSR curve respond. The selection carries forward.

PERFORMANCE CURVE FIG. A

Power coefficient Cp vs. tip-speed ratio

ESTIMATED INTERPOLATION
Bold line = selected rotor. Thin traces = measured reference chords. Small markers = digitised source points.
The evaluated TSR range is restricted to the available digitised measurements.
PEAK POWER COEFFICIENT
—
Dimensionless Cp
TSR AT PEAK Cp
—
λ = tip speed / wind speed
RPM AT PEAK · 6 M/S
—
For D = 0.70 m
SOLIDITY · PAPER DEFINITION
—
σ = 2Nc/D
SECTION C / EVIDENCE AND LIMITATIONS

Follow the evidence.

Method notes, published source details and graph artwork are provided for audit, not as additional experiments.

02 How the calculator works
I.
Evaluate the source curves

Each Figure 15 curve is traced with a monotone-preserving piecewise cubic interpolant (PCHIP) through its digitised points. No curve is extrapolated beyond its measured TSR range.

II.
Blend the curves at identical TSR (2 blades only)
t = (c − 100 mm) / (150 mm − 100 mm)
Cp(λ, c) = (1 − t)Cp,100(λ) + tCp,150(λ)

Changes in the peak TSR emerge from blending whole curves. We do not just shift one curve horizontally or vertically.

III.
Convert TSR to rotor RPM
RPM = 60 λ U / (π D)

RPM uses the paper's D = 0.70 m and U = 6.0 m/s. No generator loading is simulated in this module.

03 Evidence & limitations
PRIMARY SOURCEWatanabe, Takahashi & Ohya (2016)Energies 9(6), 406 ↗
FIGURE 15 / PAGE 102 blades · 100 & 150 mmWT only / wind lens · chord interpolation endpoints
FIGURE 16 / PAGE 113 blades · 100 mm (fixed)WT only / wind lens · separate measured comparison
DATA QUALITY

These are visually approved digitised graph traces, not author-supplied raw measurements. Interpolated chords are estimates, not additional experiments.

PAPER DISCREPANCY

The Section 5 introduction lists wind-lens geometry L = 0.57D, φ = 20°, whereas the figure captions list L = 1.14D, φ = 15°. We have not resolved this conflict.

Inspect the source figure artwork and tracing overlays ⌄

Evidence distinction: Digitised traces are approximations of published plots. Interpolation stays within their supported domain; unknown startup behaviour and generator loading are not validated here.

Later engineering modules remain in the original Notebook until migrated and checked. Source and third-party notices · Privacy policy.